
Email us at loranda@loranda.com
March 2, 2010 – Back in December (12/23/09) we posted a blog entry on the history of the Conservation Reserve Program (CRP), along with a link to a Farm Journal article that discussed some potential changes to the popular 25 year-old program. At that time, there was debate as to the future of the CRP program.
Well, the future of CRP appears to be taking shape. Specifically, U.S. Ag Secretary Tom Vilsack recently announced an expansion of the program designed to attract protection for, and expansion of, acreage suitable for ducks, quail, and pheasants – among other initiatives. To read more about the announcement, check out the February 28, 2010 article published by the Des Moines Register (click here to read the article).
What do you think – is CRP a good place for the Federal government to continue allocating funds? Send me an e-mail at doug@loranda.com to let me know your thoughts.
February 23, 2010 - One of the most interesting changes I’ve seen since I’ve been involved with Illinois and Indiana farmland involves the farm lease. Thirty years ago, the vast majority of the farm rental arrangements were based upon a sharing of the crop and the crop expenses. Fifteen years ago, the cash rent lease became more prevalent, as farmers were willing to assume more risk in their operations. This type of agreement appealed to many absentee investors as they no longer had to write checks for crop expenses or worry about marketing their grain, plus they knew exactly how much they were to receive each year.
The volatility we’ve seen in the grain markets the past 3 years is creating the need for another type of lease – the flex lease. This lease type is not new – there have been variations of it around for several years. Essentially the flex lease tries to incorporate the aspect of the cash lease that landlords found appealing (no expense checks to write and a guaranteed payment amount) with the revenue sharing aspect of the crop share lease (when grain prices go up or when yields are exceptional, the rent can go up). All this is accomplished by setting a floor rent that the farmer is willing to pay for the land, and then incorporating a formula that calculates a bonus based upon crop prices, actual yields, or both. Sometimes the formula is simple, and sometimes it’s quite complex. A recent article (Creating A Flexible Farm Cash Rent Lease) written by two Kansas State University Agricultural professors details the process that many farmers and investors are going through to try and establish an agreement that is fair, given the changing conditions in farming.
I’m confident that in the not too distant future we will see leases for farmland properties evolving again. If you have any thoughts regarding this issue, please email them to loranda@loranda.com
February 9, 2010 – You’ve no doubt seen that a lot of attention has been paid to the recent Congressional discussions focused on health care, unemployment, and job creation. However, a topic you may not have seen much about is the fact there is no estate tax on death during 2010! No doubt, the “management” of death for individuals and families of wealth has been an important one for a great many years. In 2009, for example, individual estates had an exemption of $3.5 million in value from estate taxes. And for those who inherited property in 2009, the assets that they received were given preferential tax basis treatment with the automatic “step-up” in tax basis – essentially a forgiving of the capital gain that had occurred during the life of the party who passed the asset to their beneficiary. So with no limit on the size of estates in 2010, and no tax, this must be a great deal, right?
Not so fast. As Marcia Zarley Taylor, DTN Executive Editor, recently wrote, the expiration of the previous tax law is causing some unintended consequences – and major heartburn for tax and estate planning specialists. To read the article, click here. If nothing is done about this issue by Congress in 2010, the estate tax exemption in 2011 will revert back to $1 million in value – from an unlimited dollar value in 2010. And as Ms. Taylor implies, it doesn’t take too many assets in today’s world to race through the $1 million in value exemption. That said, many who thought they were insulated/safe from estate taxes could be caught in the crosshairs in 2011. In addition, while the size of estates is unlimited from estate taxes in 2010, the preferential “step-up” in basis tax treatment is no longer in play – so beneficiaries have a lot more to think about, and do, if they plan to sell capital assets that they inherit in 2010, as capital gains could be significant. And you thought the grain markets were suspect to volatile swings! It seems that tax and estate planning circles always assumed that Congress would act to ensure some consistency at the expiration of this part of tax law – but so far it appears little has been done.
So what do you think – should Congress do anything moving forward concerning the tax treatment for estates? What do you think their inaction could do to the land market? E-mail me at doug@loranda.com with your thoughts.
Source: www.dtnprogressivefarmer.com
February 3, 2010 - The Obama Administration just released its proposed federal budget for the 2011 fiscal year starting October 1. While the details are still being analyzed, the most staggering figure is the $3.8 trillion in total spending. This includes an increase for programs that will help stimulate job growth; a freeze on discretionary spending for the next 3 years (which includes many USDA programs); an elimination of many tax preferences for industry; and a myriad of new taxes on wealthy individuals and corporations.
In the past, farm programs were often considered untouchable. With government deficits now running rampant, this may be the year when certain USDA programs are scaled back or eliminated altogether. A quick summary of what may lay ahead for agricultural can be found on the University of Illinois' “The Farm Gate” website here: (USDA's New Budget Proposal) .
I think the average American is beginning to realize that unbridled government spending has severe long-term implications. Hopefully, the federal government will heed the call to quit spending money they don’t have.
Please share your thoughts by emailing us at: loranda@loranda.com
January 18, 2010 – I hate debt. But I’m not naïve. I know and recognize that in some very capital intensive businesses (like production agriculture), properly managed debt can be a part of the equation that makes a successful enterprise. However, I think a great many people see debt as a means to get what they want sooner than they should be afforded. From my view, folks in this category often get themselves into trouble in the longer-term because of poor decisions and planning. In my opinion, such is the case at the present time with our state and federal governments. I’m not writing to make any judgment as to the quality/usefulness of the programs that have recently been funded, or those currently being funded with our tax dollars. However, I do see a train-wreck coming in future years, and to future generations, because of our current state of debt-financed spending and a lack of making difficult choices in what will be funded by our tax dollars.
Every household in America (and the world) knows it cannot indefinitely spend more than it makes. And those who argue that the government is the only entity that can “afford” to over-spend simply don’t seem to understand where tax revenues come from – that is, the collective group of households and businesses. When households and businesses are required to pay more tax to cover excessive spending, the tax-paying base will tighten its belt and budget to spend less in order to afford the extra tax they are expected to pay. Over-spending by a household, business, or government is simply an unsustainable long term trend.
What does all of this have to do with agriculture, and more specifically, the land market? Macro-economic forces. Put simply, the overall health of our economy dictates the ability of consumers to pay for the goods produced by agriculture and other productive industries. In eras of heavy debt financing, inflation of currency has often followed, which then spurs an increase in interest rates to hold inflation in check. Ask anyone who survived the 1980’s in agriculture what the key to their survival was, and you’ll often get an answer like “I wasn’t too heavily leveraged with debt when the good times broke.” And remember, it was a short 10 years between the “good times” of the mid-1970’s and the pain of the mid-1980’s.
DTN Editor-in-Chief, Urban Lehner, recently wrote an editorial that discusses “What the Government’s Debt Means for Agriculture.” To read the article, click here. While I recognize that agriculture has been on a remarkable roll in recent years, I think it is prudent to absorb what’s going on in our greater economy when making decisions in both our households and businesses.
We're always interested in your comments - e-mail me at doug@loranda.com to let me know your thoughts.
January 13, 2010 - In the past few months, there have been several stories written about the influx of institutional funds into the farmland market. While the motivation of the investors may vary - from the desire to profit on the rise in commodity prices; to capitalizing on the increasing food demand from India and China; to the need for a hedge against future inflationary pressures … the common thread in all these funds is the optimistic belief that land values will continue rising in the future. This phenomenon isn’t just limited to the U.S….funds are forming and actively seeking land in South America, Australia, and Europe as well.
The 12/29/09 article in Crain’s New York Business (New York Investment Firm Gaga for Green Acres) reflects the thoughts and attitudes of many of these major players. Whether their gamble will pay off is yet to be determined. Regardless - the new money flowing into this sector will likely help support land prices for the next few years.
We’d like to hear your thoughts. Contact us at loranda@loranda.com
December 29, 2009 – If you’ve recently borrowed money to buy a home, you know that interest rates remain near all-time historic lows (e.g., 5% for a 30-year mortgage!). Some people not involved in the agricultural sector may also assume that ag lending rates are at or near those same remarkably cheap levels. However, the facts show that this is not the case at the current time.
DTN Progressive Farmer recently published a snapshot of agricultural lending rates, provided to them by Farm Credit Services of Mid-America. To see the report of recent interest rates charged for both real estate and operating capital, click here.
As you will see, long-term (e.g., 10+ years) money borrowed for an agricultural real estate mortgage has recently been more than 30% more expensive than that for a conventional home mortgage. Why? The answer stems from our government’s support for and purchase of more than a trillion dollars in housing-related mortgage backed securities during 2009 and into 2010 (to read more about the Fed’s actions, click here). The financial support given to support the troubled housing market does not appear to be prevalent in the ag sector.
That said, ag sector lending rates – just like those for home mortgages – do remain near historic lows. However, that may change. In summation of a conversation I recently had with an ag lender, “rates only have one way to go, and that is up.” And as the Federal Reserve attempts to feather its way out of providing tremendous support for the U.S. housing market in the next year and beyond, it will be interesting to watch the spread differences between home rates and those for ag loans.
What’s your opinion – should the government continue to support the U.S. housing market? If so, is the ag sector being short-changed? Send me an e-mail at doug@loranda.com to let me know your thoughts.
December 23, 2009 - This past fall, the USDA sought public comment on the future of the Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) – what changes should be made in terms of eligibility, payment rates, etc. That got me wondering about the history of the program (it seems like it’s been around for a long time), so I checked Wikipedia and came up with the following…
The program originally began in the 1950’s as the conservation branch of the Soil Bank Program which was enacted by the Agriculture Act of 1954. The theory behind the branch of the Soil Bank Program was to focus on lands that were at high risk of erosion, remove them from agricultural production, and establish native or alternative vegetative cover in an effort to counteract actual or potential erosion. This was considered by proponents to be beneficial to agriculture generally, by lessening the effects of erosion. Originally the program called for three-year contracts in which the government would pay for land improvements that increased soil, water, forestry, or wildlife quality if the farmer would agree not to harvest or graze contracted land.
Although the roots of the program were established in the 1950’s, advocates did not start pushing the program heavily until the 1980’s, in response to more prevalent practices in the 1970’s whereby farmers increasingly began to cultivate “fence row to fence row”, and remove native habitat and vegetative stands from the fields, which was perceived as having detrimental effects on soil, water, and habitat quality. Many programs would be established in the 1980’s to address these issues.
With most government programs, the costs begin to escalate over the years and it evolves into something that it was never intended for. Yet personally, I feel that CRP has accomplished many of its original goals – it’s taken fragile land out of production that probably never should have been tilled in the first place, and it’s improved wildlife habitat. In addition, having acres out of production mean fewer bushels to sell and higher crop prices (good for the grain farmer, not so much for livestock producers). Farm Journal has a nice article this month that frames the debate (Changes Loom for CRP).
Have your own thoughts regarding the Conservation Reserve Program? Send them to loranda@loranda.com.
December 11, 2009 - On Thursday, December 10th, we conducted an auction of 83 +/- acres in southwestern McDonough County, IL. The property was offered in 2 tracts and presented bidders with both tillable farmland and woodlands. Tract 1 featured approximately 30.9 tillable acres of Class B/C soils; Tract 2 featured approximately 38 tillable acres situated in 3 tillable fields. Active bidding was present on both individual tracts, and the whole farm. Ultimately, the whole farm bidder prevailed. The final sale results were:
Tract 1 + 2 (83.55 Acres) - $265,000 or $3,171.75 per acre.
To download more details from the auction, click here.
December 7, 2009 - This previous Friday, December 4th, we conducted an auction of 217 +/- acres in southern LaSalle County, IL. The property was offered in 2 tracts and presented bidders with tillable farmland, pasture/woodlands, and a creek. The final sale results were:
Tract 1 (93.08 Acres) - $390,000 or $4,189.94 per acre; B/C Soils; FSA considered this tract to be mostly tillable land, although 22 acres had been enrolled in CRP previously and were not in production at the present time;
Tract 2 (124.69 Acres) - $590,000 or $4,731.73 per acre; A/B/C Soils; 69% Tillable, with the balance in pasture/woodlands, and divided by a creek.
The overall price for the entire 217.77 acres was $980,000, or $4,500.16 per acre.
Click here to download more details from the auction.
December 2, 2009 - The Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago just released the November issue of their Agricultural Newsletter (Fed Ag Newsletter). This quarterly publication summarizes survey responses from agricultural bankers in the region. A few notable highlights include:
1. Land values in the third quarter increased 2% across the Seventh District (IL, IN, IA, MI, WI). The biggest increase was in IA (+4%), while a drop of 1% was seen in WI & IN.
2. On average, land prices are still 4% below the levels of a year ago.
3. Agricultural credit conditions are weaker than a year ago, especially in the livestock areas. An increase in the number of forced liquidations in the livestock industry is expected in 2010.
4. 69% of those surveyed expect land values to remain stable for the near future, with 27% expecting continued weakness.
Much of the Fed’s information correlates what we’ve been seeing in our business, though I think land values may be stronger than what some of the bankers are forecasting. Personally, I think there is still a lot of “hold over” profits from 2006 – 2008 and farmers won’t pass up the opportunity to aggressively bid on a tract of land that is close to them.
We would like to know your thoughts. Feel free to send them to: loranda@loranda.com
November 17, 2009 – It’s been quite a while since widespread “financial blood” has flowed in the streets of agriculture. Very high (and well publicized) profit levels – brought on by strong corn, soybean, and wheat prices in recent years – have most grain farms in a relatively healthy condition financially. However, the same cannot be said in the livestock business. Livestock operators – and especially pork and dairy producers – have been suffering significantly in recent months and years because of poor profitability brought on by a myriad of factors including higher grain prices, which translate into higher feed costs. As a recent article by DTN points out, even “efficient, well-established operations” are being brought down by financial distress. To read the article, click here. How this might impact the agricultural industry in general remains to be seen. However, livestock producers are still one of the largest demand sources for grain – and if that demand source stumbles, it brings into question the trickle-down effects for grain prices, and grain farm profitability.
Are the financial struggles in the livestock sector a sign of things to come for cash grains? I’d like to hear your opinion – e-mail me at doug@loranda.com with your thoughts.
Source: DTN
November 3, 2009 - As if the wet spring weather wasn’t frustrating enough for many Midwestern farmers, now we’re having one of the wettest falls on record. Unfortunately, wet harvest conditions create more than just ruts in the fields. It also creates mold, fungus and other diseases that can impact the quality of the crops. And don’t forget an increase in field loss (good for wildlife, not so good for the bottom line), a substantial increase in drying costs, and finally - an increase in blood pressure. All in all... not the most ideal scenario.
If there is a positive in all of this, grain prices have recovered lately: Commodity Prices Moving Up. This should provide farmers and landowners an opportunity to catch up on some sales that they may have missed out on earlier in the year. It may be a slow and tension filled harvest, but it will get done eventually and farmers may end up with more dollars than they had expected.
How will this impact land prices? I think it will support prices in most areas, once the bins are nearly full. I think we will continue to see a real divergent marketplace – large tracts that are well drained and easy to farm will command a premium. And farms that are traditionally wet and difficult to operate will be discounted. It’s really not that much different as in the past - it’s just the price spread between the “A” quality and the “C” quality will be exacerbated. 2009 is the year when you can really see the impact of timeliness and farming efficiency on the bottom line.
Feel free to send your thoughts to loranda@loranda.com.
October 27, 2009 – The quick answer to that question is obviously “no”. But the government can create incentives for new "wind farms" to be built. Case in point - the federal government is attempting to renew investment interest in certain areas of our economy, including wind energy, by giving new, "stimulus" bill funded, cash rebates and tax incentives to those who are involved in project development. And based on a recent report from www.agweb.com, the big boys of Wall Street finance are starting to play again. To read the full article, click here. The only question I have is this – are their new wind energy investments are being made with money they were given from the TARP program?
Do you have experience with, or an opinion about, wind energy projects? If so, send me an e-mail to doug@loranda.com to let me know your thoughts.
October 6, 2009 – I’ve always been a fan of statistics. They can tell us a lot about the strength or weakness of markets, both in the short run and over the long term. Some might argue that farmland market statistics aren’t the most exciting topic in the world – however, by studying these numbers we can speculate about where we might be on the “curve of the market”. Average Illinois farmland values, for example, have gone up 61 years and have gone down 7 years since the year 1940 – that’s according to the USDA/NASS annual study. That’s a pretty good record! And by looking at the details of the statistics, we can also see that the past 4 years (2005-2008) have been one of the best runs in land value appreciation we’ve ever experienced – second only to a 6-year run of double digit appreciation in the mid-late 1970’s. I think we all remember what happened soon after the run-up of the 1970's! So... are we now at the beginning of another correction? Take a look at the numbers for yourself by clicking here. And e-mail me at doug@loranda.com to let me know where you think land values are headed.
Source: University of Missouri Extension
September 22, 2009 - I would be remiss if I did not mention the passing of Norman Borlaug last week. In case the name is not familiar, Borlaug was dedicated to using science to combat world hunger. It’s been estimated that the techniques he implemented to improve wheat yields have saved over 1 billion people from starving in Asia, Africa, and South America.
Borlaug, a Midwesterner, won the Nobel Peace Prize in 1970 and created the World Food Prize. He’s been widely credited as the father of the original “Green Revolution”. Though controversial in some circles - he advocated biotechnology and the crucial role he saw for it in feeding and enhancing the nutrition of those still in tenuous food security situations - everyone involved in agricultural production and consumption owes a debt of gratitude to this man.
To learn more about his accomplishments, visit this web site: Norman Borlaug, or simply Google his name. Feel free to share your thoughts by emailing us - loranda@loranda.com
September 15, 2009 – It is always interesting to watch the expansion and contraction of a marketplace. For example, when corn prices are high, producers are incented to produce more corn because of the higher prices, which in turn leads to lower corn prices as more supply becomes available. Sure, there is always a lag time between expansion and contraction, but a true market will generally work in this manner every time.
The same can be said in the agricultural lending market. And in 2008, many ag lenders (and farm producers) got their full dose of "butterflies" from the roller-coaster ride of the credit markets - and the fact is that a good deal of money was at more risk had been than previously envisioned. That memorable ride has translated into a tougher lending environment in 2009, and as we move into 2010. DTN Editor, Macia Zarley Taylor, recently wrote a column describing the state of affairs in ag lending. Given the strong overall health of the ag sector, the report may surprise you. However, the signs are clear that if you intend to borrow money, now is the time to get your financial house in order. To read the article, click here.
What’s your take – are people paying attention to these types of reports/warnings? Is your lender preparing for a period of economic stress by tightening loan standards, and more specifically pricing risk? Let me know by writing me at doug@loranda.com.
SEPTEMBER 1, 2009 – The economic recession that has gripped this country, and the world, has been well publicized in the media. Daily (if not hourly) updates on unemployment numbers, home sales, and bank failures can be seen everywhere. In addition, we are inundated with press reports and news briefings on what the government has been doing to help “solve” the problems of the financial, insurance, and automotive industries.
One industry that had been notably absent from the gloom and doom discussions is agriculture. Until now… On August 28th, the Wall Street Journal wrote an article that described some of the deteriorating conditions in the countryside (Financial Troubles on the Farm). Not all commodities have been affected the same. Dairy and hog producers are having some of the worst problems at the present, while sugar producers expect a record year. Grain farmers will soon realize how much lower grain prices have impacted their bottom lines, and in some cases it may not be pretty.
The experts in Washington say that the recession will soon be over. Let’s hope that the agricultural sector is included in this recovery. Stable input costs, stable commodity prices, and stable land values will be the most notable signs that the countryside is back on its feet.
Send your thoughts to loranda@loranda.com
August 25, 2009 – If you are like me, every year when you are out-and-about you pay attention to how the crops look. These types of “windshield tours” can never tell you everything about how crops are going to turn out, but they can give you a bit of an indication of likely success for a crop year from one area to the next.
Fortunately, there are also some relatively scientific crop tours that occur every summer – one of which is the Pro Farmer Midwest Crop Tour. This year’s Pro Farmer tour just concluded late last week, and the findings were clear – Iowa and Nebraska have the potential to harvest huge corn crops, and areas east of the Mississippi River are likely to be steady to slightly lower than the 2008 crop. The still-present danger for the entire Midwest is an early frost or freeze, which would be devastating to yields in many crop producing areas because of the late planting dates and slow development all summer long as a result of cooler than normal conditions. To hear a report of the crop tour for yourself, click here.
What do you think – did Pro Farmer get it right in reporting their findings for crop potential? Send me an e-mail at doug@loranda.com to let me know how crops in your area will fare.
Source: www.agweb.com
August 4, 2009 – You’ve likely heard a lot in the news in recent days about the “Cash for Clunkers” auto sales program, sponsored by our Federal Treasury. The program has been so “successful” in giving away money to support the auto industry that it’s already spent its $1 billion budget in a matter of just over a week. As a result, members of Congress are now clamoring for more money to keep the program alive. Where’s the new money going to come from, you ask? From stimulus dollars, initially targeted to support the ethanol industry. With this possible action, our members of Congress are proving to the public that what can be given with the stroke of a pen, can also be pulled with a new stroke of the same pen. See the article here.
Source: DTN
What do you think – is spending more of your tax dollars in additional support of the auto industry a better use of funds than ethanol? Should money be spent on either sector? Let me know by e-mailing me at doug@loranda.com.
August 3, 2009 – I read a lot. Books, magazines, newspapers, and online news. And every once in a while, I come across a piece that makes me stop and really think. Recently, I came across one such news article from an April 1986 Fortune Magazine that concerned the farmland market. Heavy debt loads, high interest rates, and too much speculation created a toxic environment for farmland during that era. And based on the general health of the agricultural sector in today’s world, we seemed to have learned our lesson. However, I thought you might be interested in reading a piece of history. To read the article, click here.
Source: CNNMoney
If you have a thought about how agriculture, and the land market in particular, has changed in the past 23 years, I’d love to hear about it. E-mail me at doug@loranda.com.
July 20, 2009 - It’s not often that we get heated phone calls regarding the content of our company newsletter. That said, apparently the lead article in our July 2009 LandFacts, where I discussed the effects of government policy on farmland values, got a few people riled up. One caller to our office stated… “Kudos to Mr. Moss for an article magnificently written and well done. He spoke to a minority of us - he has our support.” A second caller saw things differently “Mr. Moss is obviously some right-winger intent on undermining our government.” Wow - I didn’t know that the farmland topic could be so controversial!
For those who took the time to carefully read the whole article, you will note that I never singled out any individual or political party. In fact, I think the blame for our current economic mess should be spread on both sides of the political aisle. In addition, the thrust of the article was about economic issues and not political ones (it never ceases to amaze me how people can read into something whatever they want). The bottom line and my point - government action can alter the landscape of an entire industry and the farmland asset is not immune to these forces.
Now I know what Grandma meant when she said… “unless you want to get a fight started, never talk about religion and politics”… Agree? Disagree? Send your thoughts to loranda@loranda.com
July 14, 2009 - Do you remember during the summer of 2008, and last year's presidential campaign, when Texas businessman, T. Boone Pickens, was promoting his plan of energy independence by utilizing wind energy and natural gas as a way to wean America off of expensive foreign oil? Well, according to a recent report by Dallas Morning News reporter, Elizabeth Souder, the plan has changed because of both financing and electric transmission difficulties. It now appears that instead of building one large wind farm in a remote Texas panhandle area, that Mr. Pickens will attempt to help build several smaller wind farms that are more closely situated to population centers, and where electric transmission lines are already in place. To read the full article, click here.
Is Mr. Pickens wasting his time and money, or are wind farms the way of the future? Let me know what you think by e-mailing me at doug@loranda.com.
Source: Dallas Morning News
June 25, 2009 - If you assumed the financial and political pressures on corn-based ethanol had tabled efforts to commercialize cellulosic ethanol, think again. In a recent article, Dan Looker, Business Editor for Successful Farming magazine, discussed current cellulosic ethanol development and production efforts. South Dakota based ethanol producer POET is currently working on a 25 million gallon cellulosic ethanol plant in Iowa, and a joint venture plant between DuPont & Danisco is slated to open later this year in Tennessee. Given that the current estimate for cellulosic ethanol production is $1 per gallon more expensive than corn-based ethanol, it will be interesting to watch their progress in the coming months.
To read the entire article, continue here.
Is the use of former waste products like corn cobs and wood chips where the ethanol industry should be heading? If so, how will that impact the grain markets? Tell me what you think by e-mailing me at doug@loranda.com.
Source - www.agriculture.com